it is an incredibly dangerous and taxing sport. cyclist talk about drug use as if it is survival. all that being said, the answer is not to dope your body. the answer is the reformation of the sport, tried to make the course is safer, unionize in the cycle so they have a collective voice. lance armstrong has, striking -- strong against unionizing. that is to be the discussion, not how to get away with doping more effectively. >> let's go back to lance armstrong a meeting he became a "shalit" in the course of defending themselves from accusations that he benefited from banned substances. >> i was a bully and a sense that i tried to control them in areas. if i did not live with somebody said, for whatever reason in my own head, whether there were being disloyal i viewed or a friend turning on you or whatever, i tried to say, "that is a lie, they are liars." >> i want your comment on that and also ask possibly the doping was related to his testicular cancer? works on the first question, i think with that statement, i can imagine all the plants armstrong's lawyers collectively clinchi